We all share an interest in the health of the City – residents, business, cafes, the Council, welfare groups, the police and all.
We often refer to the CBD as a series of “precincts” or “neighbourhoods”. For convenience, Residents 3000 has 4 arbitrary sections more affectionately known as the “East End”, “Paris End”,”Heritage” and “Riverside”, (Bourke and Elizabeth Streets being the dividers).
Good development has done wonders for our City. In 1978 a professor of urban studies said we had “An empty, useless city centre”. By 2004 a Danish expert said we had “a lively, liveable and vibrant city” and commented on the distinctive, exciting neighbourhoods as one walked through the City.
Issues of interest to us all:
- Noise
- Our Streets
- Planning and Development
- Liquor Licensing
What can I do?
As we have said, our City is a series of neighbourhoods or “precincts”.
You know your neighbourhood best. So you can contribute to R3000 by letting us know what is happening around you – good and not so good.
And if you have even a little time, there are a number of ways you can help, from Committee work, to researching, to taking part in consultations with the City and other authorities, to writing submissions, to letterboxing and of course meeting other residents.
Congratulations to Councillor Richard Foster who has called for a report on the proposed Bicycle lane and that works be deferred until such time as the City of Melbourne has reviewed the proposal in detail.
http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/AboutCouncil/Meetings/Lists/CouncilMeetingAgendaItems/Attachments/10919/AUG13%20FMC1%20NOTICE%20OF%20MOTION%20CR%20RICHARD%20FOSTER%20BIKE%20LANES.pdf
Anthony van der Craats
Dear Lord Mayor and Councillors
I am writing to request that the City of Melbourne defer the development and construction of the proposed bike lane in St Kilda Road and that the development be referred fro consideration at the next City of Melbourne Future Melbourne Committee.
The Current City Council has not considered or approved the project other than approve the Council’s Budget and 4 year plan.
There are a number of major issues of concern in relation to the proposed design that should be reviewed.
LATROBE STREET BIKE LANE
The Latrobe Street bike lane has been a complete disaster with growing concern about public safety and suitability of this design. The Lord Mayor himself on public radio has indicated as such and that the City of Melbourne needs to review the development and make a number of changes to the design including the removal of on street parking.
It would be prudent that such a review is completed prior to the commencement of construction of a similar bicycle lane in St Kilda Road.
PUBLIC SAFETY
The section of St Kilda Road between Princess Bridge and Linlithgow Avenue is widely used by bus operators and members of the public visiting with family and friends the Arts precinct and the neighboring Gardens.
Many with children, elderly or disabled passengers. The proposed design and lane separation would constitute a major risk to public safety to commuters and pedestrians and needs to be reconsidered in light of the problems identified as a result of the construction of the Latrobe Street bike path experiences
The proposed lane design will force motorists to park on the outside of the bike lane three meters from the footpath creating a major risk to pedestrian and motorist safety.
Passengers alighting from parked vehicles will have to negotiate a balancing act on the one meter concrete strip and check for bicycles racing down the bike lane whilst running to reach the footpath on the other side. The design will place families with children and the elderly safety at serious risk. Mums with prams or those with wheel chairs will not be able to safely park their cars in the 3 hour parking zones. Bus drivers and taxi operators will have similar safety concerns when dropping off passengers.
The proposed “island of danger” separation barrier will be installed in the south bound location between Princes Bridge and Linlithgow Avenue south of the Floral Clock. Beyond Linlithgow Avenue the bike lane will revert back into the standard bike lane design adding to confusion and further road safety concerns.
Drivers exiting a vehicle will be forced into opening car doors into congested on coming road traffic causing a further risk to motorist safety.
BUS PARKING – DROP OFF ZONE
The proposed design is a serious threat to the safety of passengers exiting the bus with passengers having step onto the 1 metre concrete separation barrier, then wait to ensure there are no bicycles bearing down on them before crossing the 2 metre bike path on to the adjacent footpath. The situation is made worst when there are 40 other passengers all wanting to exit the bus at the same time and even worst again in an emergency situation.
ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS
The City of Melbourne needs to reconsider alternative designs that addresses the above safety issues.
In discussion with Senior City of Melbourne Engineers I understand that there was a preferred alternative design similar to the design implemented in Claredon Street East Melbourne.
A better and much cheaper option is to widen the existing bike path and delineate it from parked cars by line marking as is the case in Clarendon Street East Melbourne. This would allow sufficient room for cyclists to pass without entering in to the parked car door zone and for the same cost could be extended past the Shine up to Domain Road and beyond. They could also apply the same treatment to the other side adjacent to the Art Gallery and Concert Hall giving ratepayers more value for their dollar. The Claredon Street bicycle lane uses a delineated bicycle path with a painted safety area to protect cyclists form harm by car dooring. It allows cyclists to travel at a safe distance from parked cars.
This alternative design would be cheaper in cost to install and would allow the City of Melbourne to greater flexibility in implementing and changes that may be required.
The Claredon Street design solution addresses many of not all of the major concerns in relation to public safety without placing at risk commuter and pedestrian safety.
Further the Claredon St design solution is consistent with the other section of bicycle lane in St Kilda Road and Princes Bridge. The savings in cost would allow the city of Melbourne in conjunction with VicRoads to extend the alternative design bike path to include the entire stretch of St Kilda Road in both directions further adding to cyclist and pedestrian safety.
EMERGENCY ACCESS
St Kilda Road is a major access point for emergency vehicles from and to The Alfred Hospital in Commercial Rd
The construction of the separated bicycle lane barrier would restrict movement and egress options for emergency vehicles.
As I understand Emergency services have not been consulted on the proposed design and the alternative options. The implementation of the Claredeon Street design solution would enable greater flexibility and access for emergency vehicles.
.
REVIEW OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
It is fundamental and prudent that the City of Melbourne that the Council undertake a comprehensive review of the Latrobe Street bike lane and the proposed design of the St Kilda Rd bicycle plan.
In light of the above issues of concern. Should any person be injured as a result of the proposed development Council would be held liable for any injury and the accident would not be covered by the Victorian Motor Accident Insurance Scheme if a vehicle is not involved.
I therefore request that the City of Melbourne as a matter of urgency defer the construction of the proposed development and refer the project for further consideration at a Future Melbourne Committee and that members of the public and other stakeholders be proposed the opportunity to make further submission on the impact of the proposed design and the alternative options
Thank you for your very comprehensive analysis of the Bike Lane issues from your perspective. The Residents 3000 committee supported the Latrobe street bike lanes, but has not made a submission on the St Kilda road bike lanes as the Lord Mayor has stressed that this is a pilot programme which will undergo evaluation over 3 months.
We do appreciate your input. Thank you and keep in touch. Have you sent this to Council? Would you like me to do this?
Regards, Yolande
Is it time to claim our footpaths back from the motor cycle brigade (let alone the commercial waste bins)? I’m thinking of Flinders Lane (between Swanston & Elizabeth) in particular: a very busy pedestrian precinct feed by Degraves St. The recent civil works have done nothing to improve the appeal/ease of use!